<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Things Daley #30</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daleyrant.com/2009/12/29/three-things-daley-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daleyrant.com/2009/12/29/three-things-daley-30/</link>
	<description>Tales and tirades from The Girl Who Never Grew Up™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 17:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madge the Narcissistic Rhinoceros</title>
		<link>http://www.daleyrant.com/2009/12/29/three-things-daley-30/comment-page-1/#comment-4819</link>
		<dc:creator>Madge the Narcissistic Rhinoceros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daleyrant.com/?p=820#comment-4819</guid>
		<description>I like MySpace, shame not many people use it nowadays, Being an ex artist I like how you are free to change the appearance. (Try Karnivool&#039;s page). Facebook is plain white and unchangeable. Twitter is somewhat changeable but no one actually goes to your home page so no one ever sees your work.

MySpace is actually far superior to the others. It was designed for people who couldn&#039;t afford a web site to be able to promote themselves. There is only a few categories, ie comedy and music, and gigs go into a localised gig guide so they can be found easily. Bands are still discovered on MySpace.

Facebook was designed to keep friends in touch so it can&#039;t promote to the general public, even though it appears it can, just try a general search for an open event, and is overly complicated.

Twitter is good at hearing about news events quickly but 99% of the tweets are superfluous, or incomprehensible, or not relatable, or just gets lost on the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like MySpace, shame not many people use it nowadays, Being an ex artist I like how you are free to change the appearance. (Try Karnivool&#8217;s page). Facebook is plain white and unchangeable. Twitter is somewhat changeable but no one actually goes to your home page so no one ever sees your work.</p>
<p>MySpace is actually far superior to the others. It was designed for people who couldn&#8217;t afford a web site to be able to promote themselves. There is only a few categories, ie comedy and music, and gigs go into a localised gig guide so they can be found easily. Bands are still discovered on MySpace.</p>
<p>Facebook was designed to keep friends in touch so it can&#8217;t promote to the general public, even though it appears it can, just try a general search for an open event, and is overly complicated.</p>
<p>Twitter is good at hearing about news events quickly but 99% of the tweets are superfluous, or incomprehensible, or not relatable, or just gets lost on the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

